Sponte sua - Lexology (12/03/19)

Furthermore, the court held that Walmart was unable to prove that plaintiff’s drug test results were “so positive” that it had sufficient reason to believe that plaintiff was impaired while at work without expert testimony to establish impairment. Therefore, the District Court sua sponte entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff because it determined there was no evidence that plaintiff was impaired at work.

Fonte | Lexology